Good Comment

Iglesia Católica said...

I have lots of respect for MHFM. God has truly given them great graces to be able to make such research and studies and write it all simple enough to understand for those who truly want the truth.

As for my comments on those who commented anonymously, IF your position is correct why not show your name without fear? That's right, because you are simply cowards! The sad thing is that ALL THOSE OBJECTIONS that were brought up by those two Anonymous commentators have been REFUTED in this book: Outside the Catholic Church There Is Absolutely No Salvation. *sigh* It truly is a sad thing to be in heresy and don't know that you are in heresy. I would recommend anyone of good will to get this book (It's only $5 FREE S%H) or get the 4 DVD Special: 11 Different Programs on 4 DVDs + 3 Books (including this one) for $20 which has A LOT OF MATERIAL! This book is amazing.

You can order it here: http://store.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/3dvdspecial.html


******************************************
Here are links to this great book which demonstrate these refuted objections by these anonymous commentators. Copy and paste links.

Obj. #1: You are acting like a Protestant. The Protestant privately interprets Sacred Scripture, while you privately interpret dogmatic statements.
Ans.: BELIEVE DOGMA AS IT WAS ONCE DECLARED!

Obj. #2: Saint Emerentiana
Ans.: "Summarizing the Facts on Baptism of Blood" http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#summarizingthefacts

Obj. #3: The 1917 Code of Canon Law
Ans.: Section: “The 1917 Code– page 159” http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#Code1917

Obj. #4: This does not at all contradict Cantate Domino of Eugene.
Ans.: WRONG! FYI Exultate Deo Also Ends the Debate http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#exultatedeo
Obj. #5: You people also introduce the biggest innovation, never seen in the history of the Church: you say there are "errors" in the Summa of St. Thomas.
Ans.: St. Thomas Aquinas – http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#thomasaquinas

St. Thomas Aquinas, despite all of his fabulous writing and learning about the Catholic Faith, being a fallible human being, was wrong on many points, including his explicit statement in the Summa Theologica that “The flesh of the Virgin was conceived in Original Sin.” [St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Pt. III, Q. 14, Art. 3, Reply to Obj. 1.]
[My comments: Well, isn’t that something? Are you sure that’s not an error in the Summa of St. Thomas? Hmm… That’s a bit odd.]

Obj. #6: Council of Trent Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Ans.: Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of the Council of Trent http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#Sess6chap4

Obj. #7: This is why Fr. Feeney and his heretic followers were excommunicated.
Ans.: The Case of Father Feeney - http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#Section26

OBJ #8: What about the Good Thief?
Ans: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#Sess6chap4

To see the whole book online and ALL THESE REFUTED OBJECTIONS copy and paste link: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#privateinterpretation

Anonymous said:

"nice article. I would love to follow you on twitter."

This was in response to the Sacro Vergente Anno article. This is the Papal Document where Pope Pius XII consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart.
To your comment, I have hardly any time for my blog. Right now, this is as much as I can do, respond to comments. I will be posting some debates/refutations of some protestants that I know that are of the "once saved always saved" persuasion.
Thank you for reading some of my stuff here. If you can, tell people about the blog.
n8pzo

Anonymous Comment 02/05/10

Anonymous said:

China and Russia put the blame on some screwed up experiments of US for the earthquake that happened in Haiti.
Chinese and Russian Military scientists, these reports say, are concurring with Canadian researcher, and former Asia-Pacific Bureau Chief of Forbes Magazine, Benjamin Fulford, who in a very disturbing video released from his Japanese offices to the American public, details how the United States attacked China by the firing of a 90 Million Volt Shockwave from the Americans High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facilities in Alaska
If we can recollect a previous news when US blamed Russia for the earthquake in Georgio. What do you guys think? Is it really possible to create an earthquake by humans?
I came across this [url=http://universalages.com/hot-news/what-happened-in-haiti-is-it-related-to-haarp/]article about Haiti Earthquake[/url] in some blog it seems very interesting, but conspiracy theories have always been there.

Thank you for your comment. I am no scientist and have not done too much research on the HAARP project.
I do know this; If it is possible to manipulate the weather (I am inclined to believe it's possible) and use the forces of nature against another country (or against its own country), I have no problem believing the people in charge of our government would do so. We all know the track record our "leaders" have for such things.